Recently, modifications have taken place in downtown Denver concerning certain protected bicycle lanes. These lanes were designed to offer cyclists their own secure space within the streets. Currently, alterations have been implemented to some of the upright dividers, such as those situated alongside the safeguarded bike path on Market Street.
The cycling group has raised concerns about safety, stating that it has become riskier. However, the city maintains that the modifications were implemented for multiple reasons.
The City Department of Transportation and Infrastructure, commonly referred to as DOTI, stated that they have taken out multiple upright obstacles from thoroughfares and substituted them with traffic lane separators. They further noted that these ground-based traffic markers require less upkeep since the tall barriers frequently toppled over. Additionally, they pointed out that the new traffic lane separators are more robust, which cuts down on both repair and replacement requirements.
For June Churchill, cycling is her preferred way to navigate through the city.
As stated by Churchill, ‘Bicycling serves merely as a mode of transportation for certain individuals and embodies just a lifestyle choice.’
She serves as the head of the budget for the DOTI Advisory Board and frequently uses protected bicycle lanes. She mentioned that these lanes with vertical dividers make cyclists feel more secure due to the added buffer zone.
“Safety is key; every cyclist understands that riding outside a secure bike lane or trail can be perilous,” stated Churchill.
Cyclists are now worried that numerous barriers have been taken down. The Department of Transportation and Infrastructure (DOTI) recently completed the installation of a protected bicycle lane and barriers along Market Street last autumn.
Aylene McCallum, who co-chairs the DOTI Advisory Board, stated that planning, studying, and implementing the bicycle lanes in downtown have been ongoing efforts for several years. Significant time was devoted to researching, strategizing, and installing protective measures for these lanes, enhancing their accessibility and safety.
McCallum advocated for the construction of protected bike lanes, something cyclists desired as they felt more secure with them. However, she now considers this move to be heading in the incorrect direction.
“If proper safety measures aren’t provided, such as sufficient vertical separation in protected bike lanes, individuals may be less inclined to utilize these facilities even if they’re available. People want assurance that their commute will be secure,” explained McCallum.
The DOTI mentioned that they had been receiving feedback regarding issues with “visual clutter.” Following the modifications, they noted that visibility has improved as sightlines have become clearer, resulting in reduced visual obstruction along the hallways.
The city mentioned that they allocated approximately $200,000 for these modifications, utilizing funds designated for “community traffic management and safety.”
“It consumes precious funds that could be used to improve the cycling experience,” stated Churchill, expressing her concern that bike lanes seemed demoted without consultation, and she looks forward to greater openness in future decisions.
The removal of vertical protection from these bicycle lanes represents a significant regression for cycling,” stated McCallum. “Should this not suit all individuals, we should engage in an transparent dialogue regarding alternative solutions; however, ensuring the safety of our cyclists must remain a priority prior to making such changes.
The city mentioned they are developing various methods and plans to enhance cycling conditions, and they’ve maintained raised separators in high-traffic zones and crossroads.
Leave a Reply